More precision of my philosophy about the bad way of doing and about quantum computers and about quantum computing and about the human values and about the sexual decadence and about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the usage of

Amine Moulay Ramdane

2023-05-13 20:46:27 UTC

Hello,

More precision of my philosophy about the bad way of doing and about quantum computers and about quantum computing and about the human values and about the sexual decadence and about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

So i say that when there is too much indecency and/or too much of the not behaving correctly and/or too much of evil, people become conscious or fully aware about it , so then people start to avoid this bad way of doing by being the good way of doing, but of course there is also the way of "prevention" like of the being faith in God or enough faith in God, and there is also the way of prevention of the good philosophy, so here is my following thoughts that explains some ideas of my philosophy about decency and positivity (and of course that you have to notice that decency also comes from being faith in God or enough faith in God and it is why i have invented a new monotheistic religion and i invite you to read about it in my below thoughts):

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i
think i am a new smart philosopher and i say that the problem is not
just what i am talking about below about the sexual decadence that needs rules of decency, but i think in philosophy there is still a problem that is related to sexual decadence, and it is abstracted in my following philosophical question in french: "Comment donner de la valeur à l'être humain?", and its translation in english is: "How to give value to the human being?", so i think that the problem is that money or big money don't give value to the human being, since it comes with its too much negativity, since big money is in the economic model created by egoism that creates competition and there is also the too much negativity that comes from competition between people, so now you are understanding the philosophical question, so then i think that in philosophy we need to give value to the human being, and i think that we give value to the human being by being decency, and decency is the recognized standards of decent or proper behavior, and we also give value to the human being by being positivity that creates a meaning of human life that is efficient, and of course i have just said below that a meaning of human life that is efficient doesn't come from negativity , but from positivity, and of course positivity and its positive energy also comes from the listening to or being with positive people or surrounding yourself with positive people and positive things, and this positivity and positive energy play the role of like a lever that allows you to lift the heavy weights. So i invite you to read my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about quantum computers and about quantum computing and about the human values and about the sexual decadence and about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

IBM set to revolutionize data security with latest quantum-safe technology

Read more here in the following new article:

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/ibm-revolutionizes-data-security-with-quantum-safe-technology

And I have also just read the following article that says the following:

"AES-128 and RSA-2048 both provide adequate security against classical attacks, but not against quantum attacks. Doubling the AES key length to 256 results in an acceptable 128 bits of security, while increasing the RSA key by more than a factor of 7.5 has little effect against quantum attacks."

Read more here:

https://techbeacon.com/security/waiting-quantum-computing-why-encryption-has-nothing-worry-about

So i think that AES-256 encryption is acceptable encryption for quantum computers.

And Symmetric encryption, or more specifically AES-256, is believed to be quantum resistant. That means that quantum computers are not expected to be able to reduce the attack time enough to be effective if the key sizes are large enough, and to give you more proof of it, look at the following article from ComputerWorld where Lamont Wood is saying:

"But using quantum technology with the same throughput, exhausting the possibilities of a 128-bit AES key would take about six months. If a quantum system had to crack a 256-bit key, it would take about as much time as a conventional computer needs to crack a 128-bit key.
A quantum computer could crack a cipher that uses the RSA or EC algorithms almost immediately."

Read more here on ComputerWorld:

https://www.computerworld.com/article/2550008/the-clock-is-ticking-for-encryption.html

And about Symmetric encryption and quantum computers..

Symmetric encryption, or more specifically AES-256, is believed to be quantum resistant. That means that quantum computers are not expected to be able to reduce the attack time enough to be effective if the key sizes are large enough.

Read more here:

Is AES-256 Quantum Resistant?

https://medium.com/@wagslane/is-aes-256-quantum-resistant-d3f776163672

And it is why i have implemented Parallel AES encryption with 256 bit keys in my following interesting software project called Parallel Archiver, you can read about it and download it from here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-archiver

More of my philosophy about the private sector and about expenditure on the public sector and about systemic racism and and about the nature of God and about quantum computing and about the human values and about the sexual decadence and about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

Here is my question to ChatGPT of:

Do we have in economy to make the private sector the motor of growth and diversification ?

And here is the answer of ChatGPT:

The role of the private sector in driving economic growth and diversification is a widely debated topic among economists and policymakers. While there is no universally agreed-upon approach, many economic theories and empirical evidence suggest that a strong and dynamic private sector can contribute significantly to economic development.

Here are some reasons why the private sector is often considered important for economic growth and diversification:

- Innovation and entrepreneurship: The private sector is often seen as a catalyst for innovation and entrepreneurship. Private firms have the incentive to develop new products, processes, and technologies to stay competitive and increase their market share. These innovations can lead to productivity gains, cost reductions, and the creation of new industries, thereby driving economic growth and diversification.

- Investment and capital formation: Private businesses play a crucial role in investment and capital formation. They mobilize savings from individuals and institutions and direct them towards productive investments. This investment activity stimulates economic activity, creates jobs, and fosters the expansion and diversification of industries.

- Efficiency and productivity: The profit motive in the private sector encourages firms to be efficient and strive for productivity gains. Competition among private firms incentivizes them to adopt cost-effective practices, improve quality, and deliver goods and services that meet consumer demand. Increased efficiency and productivity contribute to economic growth and enable the economy to allocate resources more effectively.

- Job creation and employment: Private sector businesses are significant drivers of job creation and employment opportunities. As the private sector expands, it generates employment opportunities across various sectors, reducing unemployment and improving living standards. This, in turn, leads to increased consumer spending and further stimulates economic growth.

- Market-oriented decision-making: The private sector operates based on market signals and profit incentives. This market-oriented decision-making allows resources to be allocated based on consumer demand and competitive forces. It enables the economy to respond to changing market conditions, adapt to new technologies, and exploit emerging opportunities more efficiently than centralized planning.

It is important to note that the role of the private sector should be complemented by appropriate government policies and regulations to ensure a fair and competitive business environment, protect consumer rights, and address market failures. The government also has a role in providing essential infrastructure, education, and healthcare, which are necessary for the private sector to thrive.

While the private sector can contribute significantly to economic growth and diversification, the optimal balance between the private and public sectors may vary depending on the specific circumstances, goals, and challenges faced by each country or economy.

More of my philosophy about expenditure on the public sector and about systemic racism and and about the nature of God and about quantum computing and about the human values and about the sexual decadence and about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

Here is the information from ChatGPT about expenditure on the public sector as a percentage of its GDP:

As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, the United States expenditure on the public sector as a percentage of its GDP varied depending on the specific year. Over the years, it has averaged around 35% to 40% of GDP.

As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, Canada's expenditure on the public sector as a percentage of its GDP was also in the range of 35% to 40%, similar to the United States.

As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, France's expenditure on the public sector as a percentage of its GDP was relatively higher compared to both the United States and Canada. France has a more extensive welfare state and a larger public sector, which is reflected in its higher government spending as a percentage of GDP. France's public sector expenditure typically ranges from 50% to 55% of its GDP.

As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, China's expenditure on the public sector as a percentage of its GDP was relatively higher compared to the United States, Canada, and Russia. China has a significant level of government involvement in its economy and public services, which is reflected in its higher government spending as a percentage of GDP. China's public sector expenditure typically ranged from 30% to 40% of its GDP.

As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, Algeria's expenditure on the public sector as a percentage of its GDP was relatively higher compared to the United States, Canada, and Russia. Algeria has a significant presence of government involvement in its economy and public services, which is reflected in its higher government spending as a percentage of GDP. Algeria's public sector expenditure typically ranged from 40% to 50% of its GDP.

While the public sector plays a crucial role in providing essential services and ensuring social welfare, there are some perceived disadvantages associated with its size and influence. Here are a few commonly mentioned drawbacks:

- Cost and inefficiency: A larger public sector can lead to increased government spending and higher taxes to finance public services. Critics argue that this can result in inefficiencies, bureaucratic red tape, and misallocation of resources, which may hinder economic growth and competitiveness.

- Lack of competition and innovation: Some argue that a larger public sector can limit competition and innovation. State-owned enterprises may face less pressure to innovate and adapt to market demands compared to private enterprises, potentially leading to less dynamic and efficient industries.

- Political influence and corruption: A significant public sector can provide opportunities for political influence and corruption. The concentration of power in government can lead to favoritism, rent-seeking behavior, and a lack of transparency and accountability.

- Crowding out the private sector: Critics suggest that a large public sector can crowd out the private sector by competing for resources, such as skilled labor and investment capital. This may hinder private sector development and job creation.

- Dependency on government: A substantial public sector can foster a culture of dependency on the government, reducing individual incentives for entrepreneurship, self-reliance, and personal responsibility. This can create long-term welfare dependencies and reduce economic dynamism.

It's important to note that these perceived disadvantages are not universally agreed upon, and different countries may have different experiences and perspectives on the role and size of the public sector.

More of my philosophy about the nature of God and about quantum computing and about the human values and about the sexual decadence and about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so the God of my new monotheistic religion is special and it is that he is a greatly arrogant God and this nature of him of being greatly arrogant can not be changed, and of course i am saying that i am a new prophet from God that is inspired by God, and in my new monotheistic religion God is a God, but he has not created the universe, and here is my thoughts about my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read them carefully:

Of course we are all humans, so the smart way to do is not to divide humans by groups of blacks and arabs and europeans etc. but it is to "unite" them by transcending with good morality, so i think that we have not to be diversity, but we have to be a smart diversity, so i think it is about morality , so what remains is how to make humans follow the good morality, so then so that to make humans follow the good morality, you have also to know how to be disciplined at showing that you are the good morality so that to also construct the collective imaginary that makes you successful, so you have to know how to create the good human values and the good values that unite humans in following the good morality so that to be successful, so notice how i have created human values and values by inventing many poems of Love and poems, and you can read them below, and notice how i have created human values and values by inventing many proverbs, and you can read them below, and notice how i have created human values and values by inventing my thoughts of my philosophy , and you can read them in the below web links, and notice how for example monotheistic religions have allowed us to transcend with the idea of God so that to unite humans in a smarter way, and of course i have just explained that the idea of God is a simplistic thing , but inventing a new efficient monotheistic religion is a much more sophisticated thing, so you have to understand me, so i have quickly invented a new monotheistic religion that i think is efficient, so you have to read carefully about its ideas in the below web link, so you have to understand that the idea of God is a simplistic thing, but i think that inventing a new monotheistic religion that is efficient is a much more sophisticated thing, so you have to read about my new monotheistic religion so that to know how i have done it, so the first idea of my monotheistic religion is that God is not an evolutionary thing that comes from a type 4 or type 5 civilization, since he can self-improve and not curse the descendants of Adam and Eve and so he has to help humanity , but the idea of my new monotheistic religion is that the nature of God is "special" and God doesn't look like an evolutionary thing like a God of type 4 or 5 civilization, so then after that my second idea of my new monotheistic religion is that God has to be greatly arrogant, since if he is not greatly arrogant, he can for example self-improve and not for example curse the descendants of Adam and Eve, the other new idea of my new monotheistic religion is that not only Adam and Eve and there descendants were cursed by God, but the Bible and Qur'aan too were cursed by God, and it is why they contain scientific errors etc., so the other idea is that prophet Muhammed has been enhanced by God so that he can invent the Qur'aan, and the other idea of my new monotheistic religion is that prophet Muhammed is not the last prophet from God, since saying that he is the last prophet from God is part of the curse from God, and the other ideas of my new monotheistic religion is that the laws of my new monotheistic religion have to be universal, and of course you have to notice how i have smartly done it by coming with universal laws and by logically inferring them from the nature of God, and of course there is many new ideas in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read them carefully so that to notice how i have done it, so you can read my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion in the following web link, and of course you have to notice that i am saying that i am a new prophet from God that is inspired by God, and you can read my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/kFxTDu6_jus

More of my philosophy about Intel and about quantum computing and about the human values and about the sexual decadence and about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I have just said, before reading the following article, the following about Intel company from USA:

"And you have to know that in the quarter, Intel’s sales across all product lines fell by 36.2 percent to $11.721 billion, but i think that Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger is still optimistic and he insists that Intel plan to grow a whopping foundry business will pay off, and he also believes that the PC market will rebound at some point, and Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger is also optimistic about the process and server processor roadmaps, read more here about it: https://www.nextplatform.com/2023/03/31/finally-some-good-news-for-the-intel-xeon-cpu-roadmap/, so i think we have to be optimistic about Intel , and i invite you to read the other following article so that to understand more:

https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/28/intel_28b_loss/ "

So you can read carefully the following new article so that you understand more about this subject of the the recovering of the AMD and Intel CPU Market:

AMD and Intel CPU Market Share Report: Recovery on the Horizon

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-and-intel-cpu-market-share-report-recovery-looms-on-the-horizon

And so that to know more about my talking about other subjects of technology etc. , you can read my following thoughts on the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/nybxAsTXy6A

And of course, i have just talked about quantum computers in my below previous thoughts, but i think i have to explain something important so that you understand: So for a parallel computer, we need to have one billion different processors. But in a quantum computer, a single register can perform a billion computations since a qubit of a register of a quantum computer can be both in two states 1 and 0, this is known as quantum parallelism, but connecting quantum computing to "Moore's Law" is sort of foolish -- it's not an all-purpose technique for faster computers, but a limited technique that makes certain types of specialized problems easier, while leaving most of the things we actually use computers for unaffected.

So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, so i have just talked about artificial intelligence and about my new model of what is consciousness, read about it in my below thoughts, and now i will talk about quantum computing, so i have just looked at the following video about the powerful parallel quantum computer of IBM from USA that will be soon available in the cloud, and i invite you to look at it:

Quantum Computing: Now widely available!

But i have just read the following paper and it is saying that the powerful Quantum algorithms for matrix operations and linear systems of equations are available, so as you notice in the following paper that many matrix operations and also the linear systems of equations solver can be done in a quantum computer, read about it here in the following paper:

Quantum algorithms for matrix operations and linear systems of equations

Read more here:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.04888.pdf

So i think that IBM will do the same for there powerful parallel quantum computer that will be available in the cloud, but i think that you will have to pay for it since i think it will be commercial, but i think that there is a weakness with this kind of configuration of the powerful quantum computer from IBM, since the cost of bandwidth of internet is exponentially decreasing , but the latency of accessing the internet is not, so it is why i think that people will still use classical computers for many mathematical applications that uses mathematical operations such as matrix operations and linear systems of equations etc. and that needs a much faster latency, so i think that the business of classical computers will still be great in the future even with the coming of the powerful parallel quantum computer of IBM, so as you notice this kind of business of quantum computers is also dependent on the latency of accessing internet, and speaking about latency , i invite you to look at the following interesting video about the latency numbers programmer should know:

Latency numbers programmer should know

More of my philosophy about the human values and the sexual decadence and about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the "looks like" and about Jesus Christ and about the way of positivity and about how to create a civilization and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i
think i am a new smart philosopher and i say that the problem is not
just what i am talking about below about the sexual decadence that needs rules of decency, but i think in philosophy there is still a problem that is related to sexual decadence, and it is abstracted in my following philosophical question in french: "Comment donner de la valeur à l'être humain?", and its translation in english is: "How to give value to the human being?", so i think that the problem is that money or big money don't give value to the human being, since it comes with its too much negativity, since big money is in the economic model created by egoism that creates competition and there is also the too much negativity that comes from competition between people, so now you are understanding the philosophical question, so then i think that in philosophy we need to give value to the human being, and i think that we give value to the human being by being decency, and decency is the recognized standards of decent or proper behavior, and we also give value to the human being by being positivity that creates a meaning of human life that is efficient, and of course i have just said below that a meaning of human life that is efficient doesn't come from negativity , but from positivity, and of course positivity and its positive energy also comes from the listening to or being with positive people or surrounding yourself with positive people and positive things, and this positivity and positive energy play the role of like a lever that allows you to lift the heavy weights. So i invite you to read my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about the sexual decadence and about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the "looks like" and about Jesus Christ and about the way of positivity and about how to create a civilization and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i have just looked at the following french song:

La décadanse (Bande originale du film "Sex Shop")

So i think that the above french singers are not at all wise, since the above french song is a kind of sexual behavior provocation and it is sexual decadence, but i think i am a new philosopher and i will explain a very important thing, so i think that we humans come with differences between us, so this one is beautiful and that one is not beautiful and this one has a big penis and that one has not a big penis and this one has a genetical handicap and this one is strong and that one is not strong etc. so i think that the good philosophy also says that those differences of humans also requires "decency" so that to bring "harmony" to the society, so i think that sex also requires rules of decency so that to bring harmony. So i think that it is also the civilized way of doing in philosophy.

More of my philosophy about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the "looks like" and about Jesus Christ and about the way of positivity and about how to create a civilization and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new philosopher, and you have to understand what is philosophy, so i think that if you say that we humans are animals that come with "bugs" or "defects" and we are like animals, so you have to understand that talking this way is not the good way of the good philosophy, since i mean that the good philosophy is like a good software programmer that has not to be pessimistic about the existence of bugs in the software, but he has like a good professional to correct the bugs of the software, so then we have not to be pessimistic about our human conditions, but we have like a good software programmer to correct the bugs of humans and to correct the bugs in the reality. And that's the good philosophy, and it is why i am coming with my thoughts and ideas of my philosophy. So i invite you to read all my below thoughts and ideas of my philosophy so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about personal responsability and about the "looks like" and about Jesus Christ and about the way of positivity and about how to create a civilization and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

Also i think i am a new philosopher and i say that we can not say in
political philosophy that the way to transcend human suffering is by being human suffering, since in philosophy we have to to define correctly what is personal responsability so that to "tune" it correctly, so i think that this subject of defining correctly personal responsability is a hot subject in political philosophy.

And you have to understand that the "looks like" that i am using in my sentence below by saying that Jesus Christ also looks like the positivity that we have to be so that to create a meaning of human life that is efficient, is a phrase used to convey an impression or judgment based on "appearance", so the "looks like" doesn't mean that Christianity is the required and necessary positivity. So i invite you to reread all my thoughts below so that to understand my views:

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i think that Jesus Christ also looks like the positivity that we have to be so that to create a meaning of human life that is efficient , and i invite you to look carefully at the following interesting video of a good movie where Ben Hur meets Jesus of Nazareth so that to understand how Jesus Christ is positivity:

More of my philosophy about the way of positivity and about how to create a civilization and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just talked in my below previous thoughts about how to grow or how to grow as a big and interesting civilization, but i have to clarify more so that you understand, so my philosophy says that a meaning of human life that is efficient comes from positivity and not from negativity, and i think that positivity comes from a kind of discipline, i mean that so that to be the positivity and the positive energy, you can listen to or be or surround yourself with positive people and positive things, and this positive energy plays the role of like a lever that allows you to lift the heavy weights. So i invite you to read my following previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about how to create a civilization and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new philosopher, so i will ask a smart philosophical question of:

How to create an interesting and big civilization ?

So when you are not so smart, you will say that a big and interesting civilization can be created by the way of technology and science , but i think it is not so smart to answer this way, because in philosophy , this kind of smartness is not really the problem, since it is like inherent , since egoism creates competition and competition creates this kind of smartness , so how can we create an interesting and big civilization ? so i think that the problem is the following: so i think it is the way in my philosophy of how to create a meaning of human life that is efficient, i mean that a meaning of human life that is efficient doesn't come from negativity , but from positivity, and i am explaining it in my new ideas of my philosophy that you can read in the below web link, so it is why you are noticing that in my below thoughts i am saying the following:

"But now i have to explain something really important, and it is about the as we say in french: "La démarche", or in english we say: "The approach", i mean that you have to also know how to be the approach that makes you grow, so i mean that if you have a sadistic or violent approach, it doesn't make you grow and it is not the successful way of doing."

So now you are understanding that the way of how to grow or how to grow to a big and interesting civilization is the way of being positivity
that attracts people, so then positivity is good for business.

So i invite you to read my following previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about is programming dead and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I have just looked at the following new video and i invite you to look at it:

Is programming dead? | Stephen Wolfram and Lex Fridman

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that the known computer scientist that we call Stephen Wolfram that is a Jewish that lives in United Kingdom is not thinking correctly in the above video, since he is talking without defining consciousness, but you will say to me: how can we define consciousness ? so i think i am highly smart and i say that even if we don't define completely consciousness, my new model of what is consciousness defines to a certain level what is consciousness and how the human meaning is composed by brain and my new model of what is consciousness permits to predict what will be artificial intelligence, so i think it is the defect of thinking of Stephen Wolfram , so my new model of what is consciousness predicts that artificial intelligence will not attain
artificial general intelligence, but it says that it will become powerful, and it also predicts that artificial intelligence will just
replace a small percentage of software programmers of about around 25%,
so i think that software programming will not be dead , and so that to understand my new model of what is consciousness, i invite you to read my following thoughts about it:

More of my philosophy about the future Apps and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I have just looked at the following new video of techlead that i know, and i invite you to look at it:

Why ChatGPT AI Will Destroy Programmers.

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that the above techlead in the above video is not thinking correctly since he is saying that software programming is dying, since i say that software programming is not dying, since the future Apps are for example Metaverse, and of course we need Zettascale or ZettaFLOP so that Metaverse be possible, and as you notice the article below, with of Intel’s Raja Koduri talking, says that the architecture is possible and it will be ready around 2027 or 2030 and it is the following:

An architecture jump of 16x, power and thermals are 2x, data movement is 3x, and process is 5x. That is about 500x, on top of the two ExaFLOP Aurora system, gets to a ZettaFLOP.

Interview with Intel’s Raja Koduri: Zettascale or ZettaFLOP? Metaverse what?

Read more here:

https://www.anandtech.com/show/17298/interview-with-intels-raja-koduri-zettascale-or-zettaflop-metaverse-what

And also the other future Apps are for example the one that use data to be smart in real time (Read about it here: https://www.cxotoday.com/cxo-bytes/data-driven-smart-apps-are-the-future/ ) , and i also say that software programming is not dying since GPT-4 and such artificial intelligence will replace just a small percentage of software programmers, since software programming also needs to care about accuracy and reliability, so you have to look at the following most important limitations of GPT-4 and such artificial intelligence so that to notice it:

1- GPT-4 lacks on the understanding of context, since GPT-4 was trained
on large amounts of text data, but it has not the ability to
understand the context of the text. This means that it can generate
coherent sentences, but they may not always make sense in the context
of the conversation.

2- And GPT-4 is limited in its ability to generate creative or original
content. GPT-4 is trained on existing text data, so it is not able to
generate new ideas or concepts. This means that GPT-4 is not suitable
for tasks that require creativity or originality.

And i invite you to read the following article so that to understand more about GPT-4:

Exploring the Limitations and Potential of OpenAI’s GPT-4

https://ts2.space/en/exploring-the-limitations-and-potential-of-openais-gpt-4/

And more of my philosophy about the objective function and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i think i am understanding more GPT-4 with my fluid intelligence, so
i think that GPT-4 uses Deep learning and it uses the mechanism of self-attention so that to understand the context and it uses Reinforcement learning from human feedback that uses a reward mechanism so that
to learn from the feedback of the people that are using GPT-4 so that
to ensure that this or that data is truth or not etc. but i think that
the problem of GPT-4 is that it needs a lot of data and it is the first weakness, and it is dependent on the data and the quality of data and it is the second weakness of GPT-4, so in unsupervised learning that is
used so that to train GPT-4 on the massive data, the quality of the data is not known with certitude, so it is a weakness of artificial intelligence such as GPT-4, and about the objective function that guides, so i think that it is the the patterns that are found by the neural network and that are learned by the neural network of GPT-4 that play the role of the objective function that guides, so the objective function comes from the massive data on wich GPT-4 has been trained, and i think it is also a weakness of GPT-4, since i think that what is missing is what explains my new model of what is consciousness , since the meaning from human consciousness also plays the role of the objective function , so it makes it much better than artificial intelligence and it makes it that it needs much less data, so it is why the human brain needs much less data than artificial intelligence such as GPT-4. So i invite you to read my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence such as GPT-4 and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just looked more carefully at GPT-4 , and i think that as i have just explained it, that it will become powerful, but it is limited by the data and the quality of the data on wich it has been trained, so if it encounter a new situation to be solved and the solution of it can not be inferred from the data on wich it has been trained, so it will not be capable of solving this new situation, so i think that my new model of what is consciousness is explaining that what is lacking is the meaning from human consciousness that permits to solve the problem, so my new model is explaining that artificial intelligence such as GPT-4 will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, but eventhough , i think that artificial intelligence such as GPT-4 will become powerful, so i think that the problematic in artificial intelligence is about the low level layers, so i mean look at assembler programming language, so it is a low level layer than high level programming languages, but you have to notice that the low level layer of assembler programming language can do things that the higher level layer can not do, so for example you can play with the stack registers and low level hardware registers and low level hardware instructions etc. and notice how the low level layer like assembler programming can teach you more about the hardware, since it is really near the hardware, so i think that it is what is happening in artificial intelligence such as the new GPT-4, i mean that GPT-4 is for example trained on data so that to discover patterns that make it more smart, but the problematic is that this layer of how it is trained on the data so that to discover patterns is a high level layer such as the high level programming language, so i think that it is missing the low level layers of what makes the meaning, like the meaning of the past and present and the future or the meaning of space and matter and time.. from what you can construct the bigger meaning of other bigger things, so it is why i think that artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, so i think that what is lacking in artificial intelligence is what is explaining my new model of what is consciousness, so you can read all my following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand my new model of what is consciousness and so that to understand my views about different other subjects:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/QSUWwiwN5yo

More of my philosophy about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am saying in my below previous thoughts: "being publicity"

So we can ask if it is correct in english to say: "being publicity"

So i will say that there is two things , it can be that it is not commonly used in english, but it is logical to say "being publicity", and it can be that it is not commonly used in english , but it is not logical to say "being publicity", but i have just discussed this subject with ChatGPT, and i think i have just won the game against ChatGPT, since i have just explained to ChatGPT that it is logical to say "being publicity". And here is my discussion with ChatGPT:

Here is my first question to ChatGPT:

"Can we say: "you have to know how to be efficient at the being publicity""

And ChatGPT has just answered the following:

"The sentence "you have to know how to be efficient at the being publicity" is not grammatically correct. Here are a few possible rephrasings that could convey a similar idea:

"You need to know how to be efficient in promoting yourself."
"Being efficient in publicizing yourself requires certain skills and knowledge."
"To be effective in promoting yourself, you need to understand the principles of publicity and how to apply them.""

And my second question to ChatGPT is the following:

"What is: publicity"

And ChatGPT has just answered the following:

"Publicity refers to the practice of creating and maintaining a positive public image or awareness of a person, brand, product, or organization through various forms of media communication. It involves generating public interest, attention, and awareness about a particular entity or its offerings, with the goal of increasing visibility, reputation, and ultimately, sales or support.

Publicity can be achieved through various means, such as media coverage (i.e., appearing on TV, radio, newspapers, or online news outlets), social media marketing, advertising, events, and sponsorships, among others. It is an essential component of marketing and public relations, as it helps build brand recognition, establish credibility, and differentiate from competitors. Effective publicity strategies involve targeting the right audience, crafting compelling messages, and delivering them through the appropriate channels."

So i have just again asked the following question to ChatGPT:

"But the practice of creating and maintaining a positive public image or awareness of a person, brand, product, is also the being, so we can logically say being publicity"

And ChatGPT has just answered the following:

"I see what you mean. While it's true that creating and maintaining a positive public image or awareness of a person, brand, product, or organization is a key aspect of publicity, it's not common to use the phrase "being publicity" to describe this practice.

Instead, we usually use phrases like "doing publicity" or "engaging in publicity" to refer to the actions involved in creating and maintaining a positive public image. For example, "She is doing publicity for her new book" or "The company is engaging in a publicity campaign to promote its latest product."

That being said, language is always evolving, and new phrases and expressions can emerge over time. It's possible that "being publicity" could become a more widely accepted phrase in the future."

And again i have just asked ChatGPT the following question:

But i think it is logical to say "being publicity", so we can say it.

And ChatGPT has just answered the following:

"Language is a tool for communication, and its meaning and usage depend on how people use it. While it's true that language can be flexible and adaptable, it's also important to consider how a particular phrase or expression might be perceived and understood by others.

In the case of "being publicity," while it may be logically sound in terms of the meaning you intend to convey, it is not a commonly used or accepted phrase in English. If you use it in conversation or writing, there is a risk that it may be unclear or confusing to your audience.

Instead, to ensure clear and effective communication, it might be better to use more commonly accepted phrases such as "doing publicity" or "engaging in publicity" to describe the practice of creating and maintaining a positive public image or awareness of a person, brand, product, or organization."

And i have also just asked the following question about the "being" to
ChatGPT:

"When we say being kind , it also means the doing the kind."

And ChatGPT has also just answered the following:

"You are correct that the phrase "being kind" can also be interpreted as "doing the kind thing" or "acting kindly.""

More of my philosophy about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new philosopher, and i will talk more about Islam in a philosophical way, so i think that Islam is "mostly" about the low level layer of morality of for example how to be humble and how to be more trust between people and how to be the good way of behaving and how to be the good family values, and the Qur'aan was a sophisticated way of thinking that makes you believe and makes you be the good morality of the low level layer, so the low level layer of morality is also in relationship with politics, and you have to notice that philosophy thinks with sophistication so that to make you follow the rules or the laws of the good philosophy, but i say that Islam is not like philosophy, since in philosophy we can ask of how to make follow correctly those rules of the low level layer of morality that Islam has wanted to make us follow ? so now you are understanding the goal of the believing in God or the being faith in God, and now you are understanding why i have also invented a new monotheistic religion, and you can read about it in the below web link, but so that to understand my new ideas of my philosophy, i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/nybxAsTXy6A

And read my following thoughts so that to understand better:

More of my philosophy about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new philosopher, but of course i am posting about other subjects too, so i have showed you my new ideas of my philosophy, and you can read them in the below web link, but now i have to explain something really important, and it is about the as we say in french: "La démarche", or in english we say: "The approach", i mean that you have to also know how to be the approach that makes you grow, so i mean that if you have a sadistic or violent approach, it doesn't make you grow and it is not the successful way of doing, so what is the good approach in philosophy ? so i think that it is also like the good
business, since i am for example showing how i am doing it in my below thoughts, so for example in business you have to be good at publicity ,
so as you are noticing in my below thoughts, that i am also making publicity about arabs, but of course i am trying to be objective about it, so the good approach is also the knowing how to make publicity, so in publicity you have to know that you have to know how to be objective and how to be efficient at the being publicity, so as you notice that the good approach is also that you have to know how to talk and how to walk and how to think, since
the knowing how to talk and how to walk(and the walk here is also symbolic) and how to think is also the basis of the making publicity to yourself, so as you notice that the good approach is also like the good business, so as you are noticing that my below new poem in french is also like the good publicity and the good diplomacy , since it needs the good approach so that you be successful, and as you are understanding that the being the good Diplomacy is also essential to your way of doing business with humans, so now you are understanding the why i have also invented my new ideas of my philosophy and the why i am talking as i am talking in such manner, so i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy in the following below web link so that to understand my kind of personality and so that to understand my philosophy:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/nybxAsTXy6A

And you can read my other new thoughts below:

More of my philosophy about africans and about black Africans and more of my thoughts..

I have just said, read it below, that ancient Egyptians were whites, but you have not to think that i am this or that, but it is just that i am in north america that is "mostly" white europeans, so i have to be "pragmatic" by talking as i am talking about the facts, since i have also to be careful about it, since am i in arab countries ? or am i in Africa ? So then i will say that even if there is violence in USA between some violent groups of people, so i invite you to read my following new poem in french about Africans and "black" africans so that you understand more my kind of personality:

Here is my new poem in french:

--

L'Africain n'est pas comme le tibétain

Car l'africain aime bien manger comme le méditerranéen

Car l'africain sait comment être le joli comédien

Car l'africain n'est pas comme un bédoin

Car l'africain aime bien être habillé comme un joli félin

Alors c'est que l'africain aime aussi bien jouer au médecin

Alors c'est aussi que l'africain aime bien être le bon lycéen

Alors c'est aussi que l'africain n'aime pas le déclin

Et cela veut dire que l'africain ressemble aussi au joli sumérien

--

So now you are understanding why i am talking as i am talking in my below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about Europeans and about Maghrebis and about Egyptians and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

Look at my below thoughts where i have just proved that Southern Europeans and and Eastern Europeans are descendants of Middle Eastern Arabs, but i will say that not only the Southern Europeans and Eastern Europeans that are descendants of Middle Eastern Arabs , but it is even Maghrebis or Maghrebians that are descendants of Middle Eastern Arabs and of Europeans, and you can read carefully about the genetics of Maghrebis or Maghrebians and about the genetics of today Egyptians in the following interesting web link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maghrebis

And i will also say that the proto-arabic language is very old and it is the earlier form of arabic language and it comes from northern Arabia
and it comes from Jordan and Syria(Read here to notice it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Arabic_language) and the arabic language comes also from the same places, and you have to know that even in that very old Arabia, the literacy haS been extraordinarily widespread(Look at the following video so that to understand it:

And what about the Egyptians? so read the following proof that says that ancient Egyptians were whites:

"The problem, it was thought, is that mummy DNA couldn't be sequenced. But a group of international researchers, using unique methods, have overcome the barriers to do just that. They found that the ancient Egyptians were most closely related to the peoples of the Near East, particularly from the Levant. This is the Eastern Mediterranean which today includes the countries of Turkey, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon. The mummies used were from the New Kingdom and a later period, (a period later than the Middle Kingdom) when Egypt was under Roman rule."

Read more here:

https://bigthink.com/philip-perry/were-the-ancient-egyptians-black-or-white-scientists-now-know

So as you are noticing above, that ancient Egyptians were whites and that they were most closely related to the peoples of the Near East, particularly from the Levant. This is the Eastern Mediterranean which today includes the countries of Turkey, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon.

And so that to understand more about how Arabs are smart, i invite you
to read my following thoughts so that to understand my views:

As the jews are smart people, I think that Arabs are smart people too, since other than the smart Arab from Egypt who won a Nobel prize for Chemistry in year 1999, read about it below, there is a new smart Arab from Egypt who has just invented the fastest optical “transistor” that is a million times faster than the speed of the current semiconductor-based transistor, and you can read about it in the following two articles:

Egyptian world of attoseconds.. the fastest optical “transistor”

Read more here:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/egyptian-world-of-attoseconds-the-fastest-optical-transistor.761639/

And read also in the following article:

Optical switching at record speeds opens door for ultrafast, light-based electronics and computers

Read more here:

https://phys.org/news/2023-03-optical-door-ultrafast-light-based-electronics.html

And you can read the following web page about the arab from Egypt who won a Nobel prize for Chemistry in year 1999:

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ahmed-Zewail

And I think that arabs are smart people, read also the following article about arab american immigrants so that to notice it:

In fact, the U.S. is the main home for Arab inventors globally, distantly followed by France (513 patent applications), Canada (361), Germany (342), Saudi Arabia (307), Japan (279) and the United Kingdom (273)

The innovative flair arab Inventors bring to America

Read more here:

https://knowledge.insead.edu/blog/insead-blog/the-innovative-flair-arab-inventors-bring-to-america-5431

And read the following interesting article about arabs:

Research: Arab Inventors Make the U.S. More Innovative

It turns out that the U.S. is a major home for Arab inventors. In the five-year period from 2009 to 2013, there were 8,786 U.S. patent applications in our data set that had at least one Arab inventor. Of the total U.S. patent applications, 3.4% had at least one Arab inventor, despite the fact that Arab inventors represent only 0.3% of the total population.

Read more here:

https://hbr.org/2017/02/arab-inventors-make-the-u-s-more-innovative

And so that to notice how Arabs are smart people, i invite you to read
my following thoughts about them on the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/MPEszysNKhw

And more of my philosophy of how Europeans are descendants of Middle Eastern Arabs..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

Southern Europeans and and Eastern Europeans are descendants of Middle Eastern Arabs, and you can read my following thoughts about it:

I have just read the following interesting article, and i invite you to read it:

Europeans come from three ancient populations

https://www.adelaide.edu.au/news/news73222.html

So i have just questioned more ChatGPT about this subject, and
ChatGPT has answered me that the Studies have shown that the genetic contribution of Middle Eastern farmers to modern-day Europeans is estimated to be around 20-50% on average. However, this percentage varies widely depending on the specific population being examined. For example, populations in southeastern Europe, such as those in Greece and the Balkans, are generally believed to have a higher proportion of Middle Eastern farmer genetics than populations in northern Europe.

Here is my first question to ChatGPT:

How much we find Middle Eastern farmers genetics in the European genetics ?

And ChatGPT has answered me the following:

The degree to which Middle Eastern farmer genetics can be found in European genetics varies depending on the specific population and region in Europe being examined. However, it is generally accepted that the Neolithic period, when farming first emerged in the Middle East, had a significant impact on the genetic makeup of populations across Europe.

Genetic studies have shown that the early farmers who migrated from the Middle East into Europe around 8,000 years ago brought with them a new way of life, including farming and animal domestication. This migration and the genetic mixing that followed led to a significant shift in the genetic makeup of European populations, particularly in the regions that saw the most interaction with Middle Eastern farmers.

Some specific examples of Middle Eastern farmer genetic contributions to European populations include the genetic marker known as G2a, which is found at relatively high frequencies in the Balkans and the Caucasus, and the genetic marker known as J2, which is found at higher frequencies in the eastern Mediterranean and parts of southern Europe.

Overall, while the extent to which Middle Eastern farmer genetics can be found in European populations varies, it is clear that the Neolithic period had a significant impact on the genetic makeup of European populations, and that Middle Eastern farmers played an important role in this process.

And my other question to ChatGPT is the following:

And from wich regions in the today world has come the the Middle Eastern farmer genetics ?

And ChatGPT anwered me the following:

The Middle Eastern farmer genetics that contributed to the genetic makeup of populations in Europe originated from the Fertile Crescent, a region that encompasses modern-day Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and parts of southeastern Turkey.

The Fertile Crescent is considered the birthplace of agriculture, where the domestication of plants and animals first occurred. The development of farming allowed for the growth of settlements and the rise of complex societies, which ultimately led to the spread of these new agricultural practices to other parts of the world.

During the Neolithic period, which began around 10,000 years ago, farmers from the Fertile Crescent began to migrate into Europe, bringing with them the knowledge and skills of agriculture. These migrations were likely driven by a combination of factors, including population growth, environmental pressures, and the search for new resources and trade opportunities.

The genetic legacy of these early farmers can still be seen in modern-day European populations, particularly in the southern and eastern regions that were most influenced by these migrations. However, it is important to note that populations in the Middle East have also undergone genetic changes over time, and the genetic makeup of modern-day populations in the region is complex and diverse.

And my other question to ChatGPT is the following:

What are the countries of southern and eastern regions ?

And ChatGPT answered me the following:

The countries of southern and eastern regions of Europe can vary depending on the specific definition used, but generally include the following:

Southern Europe:

Italy
Greece
Spain
Portugal
Malta
Cyprus

Eastern Europe:

Romania
Bulgaria
Serbia
Croatia
Hungary
Slovenia
Slovakia
Poland
Ukraine
Belarus
Moldova
Russia (parts of western Russia are often considered part of Eastern Europe)

These regions of Europe are believed to have been most influenced by the migrations of Middle Eastern farmers during the Neolithic period, which led to the spread of farming and the mixing of genetic populations. However, it's important to note that the genetic makeup of modern-day populations in these regions is complex and diverse, and may also have been influenced by subsequent migrations and historical events.

And my other question to ChatGPT is the following:

How much approximately we find of percentage in genetics of those Europeans of those farmers southern and eastern regions ?

And ChatGPT has answered me the following:

The percentage of Middle Eastern farmer genetics found in modern-day populations of southern and eastern Europe varies depending on the specific population and region being examined, as well as the methods used for analysis.

Studies have shown that the genetic contribution of Middle Eastern farmers to modern-day Europeans is estimated to be around 20-50% on average. However, this percentage varies widely depending on the specific population being examined. For example, populations in southeastern Europe, such as those in Greece and the Balkans, are generally believed to have a higher proportion of Middle Eastern farmer genetics than populations in northern Europe.

It's also important to note that genetic contributions from other populations, such as hunter-gatherers and later migrations, have also played a role in shaping the genetic makeup of modern-day European populations. Therefore, while the influence of Middle Eastern farmers on European genetics is significant, it is only one of many factors that have contributed to the genetic diversity of populations in the region.

Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane,