Discussion:
One democracy
(too old to reply)
111222333
2024-09-12 16:41:17 UTC
Permalink
Maybe we could make one large democracy. I don't want us shooting each
other.
ltlee1
2024-09-22 17:04:44 UTC
Permalink
One democracy of one people or Type 2 "End of History"?

"IMLAY CITY, Mich. — Jerry Katich says he’s “locked and loaded.”
..
“I’m ready for anything to transpire, whether it’s an EMP going off,”
said Katich, 67, referring to an “electromagnetic pulse” event like a
nuclear attack, “or World War III.”
..
A private Facebook group that he founded, Michigan Preppers, has nearly
18,000 members, up from about 8,000 since the Covid pandemic. He
attributes the growth to a feeling of turmoil during President Joe
Biden’s term.

Uncertainty fueled by global wars, months of protests, rising costs and
another presidential race — with the specter of the Jan. 6, 2021,
Capitol riot and now a second apparent attempted assassination of
Republican nominee Donald Trump — has “preppers” like Katich especially
vigilant.

“If Trump isn’t elected, I’m thinking we’re either looking at a military
coup or we’re looking at a second civil war,” said the part-time steel
company worker. “It won’t happen right away, but it will take time to
formulate.”"


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/election-fears-ignite-preppers-already-planning-catastrophic-unknown-rcna170399
ltlee1
2024-09-24 15:00:25 UTC
Permalink
"The principal danger to the United States is not any out-of-control
technology or fringe militia group. It is not economic grievances run
amok. It is not even Trump, who is as much a symptom of what ails the
United States as he is a cause. Instead, the greatest source of danger
comes from a cultural clash over the nature of the United States’
identity—one with profound implications for who gets to be a citizen.
Its key actors are not isolated radicals but large numbers of ordinary
Americans. According to new research carried out by my team at the
University of Chicago, tens of millions of Democrats, Republicans, and
independents believe that political violence is acceptable. Many of them
hail from the middle and upper class, with nice homes and college
educations.

The country’s fight over its national identity has multiple dimensions.
But the most serious is demographic change. In 1990, 76 percent of the
U.S. population identified as white. In 2023, the U.S. Census Bureau put
that figure at a little over 58 percent. By 2035, the share is set to
fall to 54 percent; a decade later, it will dip below 50 percent. These
changes have led to rising anger among conservatives, many of whom see
increased ethnic diversity as an existential threat to their way of
life. These voters have embraced Trump and his nationalist movement,
which promise to stop such change in its tracks. Trump’s exclusionary
policies and rhetoric have, in turn, prompted a ferocious backlash from
liberals, who embrace demographic change—or who at least fear that
conservative success will cost Americans hard-won freedoms.

The anger on both sides is in keeping with historical precedents.
Scholars have long understood that social change and demographic shifts
are a potent catalyst for violence. And as elsewhere, the turn toward
force in the United States is fundamentally populist in nature. The
millions of Americans who support political violence have concluded that
their country’s elites are so thoroughly corrupt and that their
democracy is so completely broken that riots, political assassinations,
and coercive attacks are acceptable and even necessary to bring about
the supposedly genuine democracy that people deserve."

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/our-own-worst-enemies
Loading...